Everton fans continue protests; Burnham wants ruling made ‘null and void’

0 19


Everton Supporters protested further Premier League In a 10-point demurrer to prominent politician Andy Burnham, he called for the conviction to be “null and void”.

The club were fined last week for breaching the Premier League’s profit and sustainability rules, which saw them relegated ahead of Sunday’s game. Manchester United.

Pink leaflets – mocking the Premier League’s own branding style and containing the word ‘corruption’ – were distributed before the game, which were held up by fans as players left the tunnel.

The Premier League’s pre-match anthem was booed and the pink cards were up again in the 10th minute with a spot-kick.

There have been a number of fan protests in recent days, with one fan group – The 1878s – setting up a crowdfunding campaign earlier in the week to help finance the production of protest banners and flags.

Around 50 fans gathered at the gates of the Premier League’s London headquarters on Friday evening.

A plane flew over the Etihad following a banner with the same ‘corruption’ message during the televised game on Saturday. Manchester City And Liverpool.

Everton’s punishment was decided by an independent commission after a hearing last month and the club will appeal.

Manager Sean Dyche said ahead of Sunday’s game that he understood the fan protests – but urged supporters to support the players on the pitch.

“I can’t get involved in anything that’s outside of my domain, but the way Everton got behind the club shows a sense of injustice,” Dyche said. All we ask for is their support and support in the stadium, and all we ask is for this to continue.

Burnham complained to the Premier League


Liverpool-born politician Andy Burnham has lodged a formal complaint with the Premier League (Getty Images)

Meanwhile, Everton fan and Greater Manchester Mayor Andy Burnham has lodged a formal complaint with the Premier League, calling for the ruling to be “null and void”.

Ahead of the game, Liverpool-born Burnham shared a letter from Premier League chairman Alison Brittain questioning the Premier League’s process.

Burnham wrote as an Everton season ticket holder, not in an official capacity, but said: “I believe the handling of this matter will cause concern to anyone who cares about the integrity of English football and wants to see it continue.” Premier League Success”.

They wrote: “For the Premier League to try to introduce a new penalty policy in the middle of this process is, in my view, an abuse of process.” I would argue that he should have had a place before starting these proceedings and setting up this commission.

Burnham expressed concern about the “seemingly arbitrary decision under pressure from the Premier League” and asked: “How on earth can Everton Football Club be treated fairly in this situation?” he appealed.

He continued: “How is it fair that a breach of the PSR rule for £20m is a 10-point penalty and a club only gets a nine-point penalty when they go into administration?”

“I’m not arguing that Everton have no case to answer or that they don’t deserve any punishment. The issue is whether the process was fair.

The president said the “only fair course of action” would be for the panel’s decision to be declared “absolute and void” and called on the Premier League to issue a proposed penalty framework for the clubs “without delay”.

The Premier League has yet to respond to the letter, which was received on Sunday afternoon, but it is understood Burnham did not fully understand the process and the decision.

The league could advise Burnham that both sides – himself and Everton – would weigh in on a sanction, with an independent panel ruling out that either was appropriate.

Premier League financial rules allow clubs to lose a maximum of £105million (£128.4m) over three years.

Everton were fined by an independent commission after a five-day hearing last month found that the club’s PSR calculations had cost them £124.5m.

Everton initially strongly defended their compliance but moved to accept a guilty plea, claiming a breach of £8m and offering mitigating factors including the cost of the new stadium build and the impact of Covid-19.

There have been several precedents in the English Football League (EFL) in recent years, however, punishment for breaches of profitability and sustainability regulations at the highest level of English football has been unprecedented.

Middlesbrough In the year In the 1996-97 season, he was charged three points for not completing the game Portsmouth In the year After going into administration in January 2009, he was hit with a nine-point penalty during the campaign.

The decision in Everton’s decision came after the Premier League adopted a penalty policy it deemed appropriate for FSR breaches in August, but later told the commission it was “evidence” rather than a “binding formula” it wanted to impose. . Unlike the EFL, guidelines on sanctioned financial misconduct are not included in the Premier League’s official rulebook.

“If the Premier League wishes to impose a binding structured formula on the commission dealing with PSR violations, it can do so,” the ruling said.

Despite Burnham’s calls, the Premier League has no plans to publish a penalty framework any time soon.

Go deeper

Go deeper

Everton points deduction: What’s the club’s case in defense appeals?

(Photo: Getty Images)





Source link

Leave A Reply

Your email address will not be published.

This website uses cookies to improve your experience. We'll assume you're ok with this, but you can opt-out if you wish. Accept Read More