Israel-Hamas war: Global perspectives on the Gaza operation – opinion

0 19


Nine years ago, in July 2014, Israel A Campaign against Hamas. Operation Defensive Edge achieved important tactical objectives, but the primary goal was not the long-term end of Hamas terror, nor were additional campaigns more successful. The aim of current warfare is to convert tactical gains into strategic gains. Although there are no final opinions on the desired post-war status of the Gaza Strip (and this may not be entirely up to us), there is no real disagreement that Hamas, and especially its leadership, must be removed physically and ideologically.

Israel has no permanent interest. occupying the Gaza StripHowever, a temporary military regime will have to be created to root out any future terrorist resurgence. There have been calls in some political circles to restore the Gush Katif settlement, but this idea is not only inappropriate and impractical, but also undermines efforts to gain legitimacy in our war with Hamas.

Historically speaking, a man at the beginning of the Six Day War, the Minister of Defense Moshe Dayan. Gaza strip And leave it to the Egyptians to deal with it – the IDF chief at the time, Rabin, is ignored.

International perspectives on Israel’s war to wipe out Hamas in Gaza

In addition to bringing the Palestinian issue back to the front pages, Hamas’ main strategic goal in the October 7 attack was to halt the normalization process between Israel and other Arab countries, primarily Saudi Arabia. In his view, normalization will be an ongoing effort – and Israel’s responses must be ongoing as well.

As it turns out, the goal of Iran, Hamas’ protege, is to undermine normalcy. Whether or not it was complicit in planning the massacre, the method, the funding, the tactics – and the animalism no less – belonged to Iran.

US National Security Adviser Jake Sullivan spoke about the Biden administration’s Middle East policy in September. Hamas violence is still weeks away, but attacks on US troops and officials in various parts of the region have escalated, and Iran’s threats against Israel have escalated – facts that make the duality of US policy troubling.

Ruined buildings are seen in southern Israel as seen from southern Israel during the interim truce between Hamas and Israel, November 25, 2023 (Credit: REUTERS/Alexander Ermochenko)

As the historian Walter Russell Mead wrote: “He failed to please Iran. Iran will not be pleased, but this truth is too inconvenient for the Biden administration to admit. Administration spokesmen continue to play down Tehran’s involvement and responsibility in the killings. Iran thinks it will be free to advance its nuclear program while Israel tries to negotiate with Hamas…”

advertisement

The US side is clearly important in this regard.

In the current war, Israel’s strategic goal is to reverse the Iran-Hamas design beyond the battlefield — a goal shared by the United States, the strategic driving force behind the push for normalization between Saudi Arabia and Saudi Arabia. Israel as an integral part of geopolitical realignment in our region. More broadly, not only in our region – Iran, Hamas and their proxies in Iraq, Syria and Yemen are currently at the forefront of the future world order conflict between China, Russia and the Iranian axis – and the West is led by the US.

America’s moral and ethical support for Israel in its current struggle is based on a clear American interest: removing Hamas as a threat to regional stability is part of Iran’s overall designs for the region and reinforces its image of success. Both the perception and reality of the IDF are important to the US in the context of a possible future conflict with Iran, but also because of the Abraham Accords and their hopes for an extension to Saudi Arabia. The success of American weapons – like the Yom Kippur War – is also important.

Not everyone in the United States, including the party of the President of the United States, Joe Biden, and, as recently announced, even in the administration, do not see the issue in the same way, but the American support will be a test of the continued commitment to Israel. More than an international struggle.

There are some alarmists, not always interested, who warn that the war in Gaza could ignite a global war, but the chances of this happening are practically negligible, because China has neither the desire nor the readiness for such an event. A potential cause of world conflict is that Taiwan is in China’s backyard, not the Middle East.

Still, and while the United States doesn’t want a regional war, it can’t ignore the real regional aspects of the current conflict, including the almost daily Iranian-inspired acts of terrorism against its military and interests in Syria and Iraq – which it is leading. Among other things, to improve the military presence in the area, most of it is close to the Iranian coast.

Hamas is almost universally hated by most Arab leaders in Israel because of its Islamic fundamentalism and threats to their own regime. This is the desire of international actors to raise their level in geopolitics, economy, diplomacy, technology, culture, etc.

For that reason, Israel’s military victory in Gaza – especially in the background of the negative feelings caused by the collapse of October 7 – is necessary to renew and strengthen the pan-Arab interest in a regional framework that includes Israel.

For obvious reasons, Saudi Arabia’s Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and other Arab leaders must walk a fine line between their country’s national interest — and public solidarity with the people of Gaza — but ultimately, one’s national interests will prevail.

There are some analysts who doubt Israel’s chances of achieving all of its strategic goals. That is, the Israeli army, although it is the most powerful military factor in the Middle East, can lose the war against a murderous enemy that cares little for the lives of its people and takes advantage of the destruction and the victim’s opportunity to replace the atrocities committed by the world and the fate of hostages with a hypocritical humanitarian front. Antonio Guterres image falsely attributed to Israeli atrocities against women and children in Gaza.

Despite large-scale anti-Israel demonstrations in some countries, most of the Western world has not fallen into the anti-Israel trap, but time is not on Israel’s or Biden’s side. There is no shortage of articles in the world press that begin with the phrase “Israel has the right to defend itself” – it continues only in the next paragraph.

International understandings are especially important for Israel, but Israel needs to make clear that at this time it must implement its efforts to free itself from the terror of Hamas and hopefully lay the foundations for a stable reality in the region. In any case, there is a more optimistic and realistic scenario.

The desired actual outcome of the war, despite its difficulties, will not be compared to the partial results of previous campaigns, but rather to the destruction of ISIS and al-Qaeda and their leaders. The example is certainly not perfect (it never could be), but there are more than one reason to expect Hamas to suffer a similar fate.

The writer, a former MK, served as ambassador to the US from 1990-1993 and 1998-2000.







Source link

Leave A Reply

Your email address will not be published.

This website uses cookies to improve your experience. We'll assume you're ok with this, but you can opt-out if you wish. Accept Read More