Opinion | People need to face a sad truth about Die Hard

0 37

With Thanksgiving in the rearview mirror, the holiday season is kicking into high gear. Unfortunately, the holiday cheer brings people who believe “Die Hard” is a Christmas movie. But I will not fall prey to such foolish tricks. Sure, some might call me a Grinch, but I value the truth too much to allow that to happen.

Most action movies come and go. But “Die Hard” remains relevant because of its fans who say it’s a holiday movie. It lacks the quality and depth of meaning that make action movies such as “Star Wars” and “Pirates of the Caribbean” timeless classics. Instead, the film relies on the celebration of Christmas to convince people to renew this argument every year for attention and financial gain.

The crux of the argument behind “Die Hard” being a holiday movie rests on how the movie is set at Christmas. However, this logic becomes very problematic when applied to other films. For example, in One of the most important scenes in 2002’s “Spider-Man” is when Norman Osborn (Willem Dafoe) discovers the identity of Spider-Man (Tobey Maguire) during the Thanksgiving dinner. This scene depicts a more important event in the context of a holiday than any other episode of “Die Hard.” So why don’t people argue that “Spider-Man” is the Thanksgiving movie every year?

The answer to this question “Spider-Man” does not revolve around the images of gratitude. Likewise, “Die Hard” doesn’t revolve around Christmas imagery. By that logic, one shouldn’t classify it as a Christmas movie – just like people wouldn’t consider “Spider-Man” a Thanksgiving movie.

Equally confusing is the fact that people allow the setting of a film to define the aspects and nature of the film. Take the timeless “Indiana Jones and the Raiders of the Lost Ark” or the classic “Indiana Jones and the Last Crusade” movies. They were set during World War II, but were clearly adventure films, not wartime films. Indiana Jones was not published as WWII film genre labels like “Saving Private Ryan” or “Dunkirk”. Likewise, “Die Hard” shouldn’t be placed in the same company as “Home Only” or “Elf.”

In addition to eschewing classic Christmas tropes, “Die Hard” actively extols values ​​that go against the lessons Christmas movies typically try to teach. The film’s focus on violence and destruction couldn’t be more counter-intuitive to the holiday season’s message of generosity and love for others. This juxtaposition between the characters’ on-screen values ​​and the underlying meaning of the Christmas proposal is crucial to the credibility of the argument that “Die Hard” is a Christmas movie.

When asked to watch a holiday movie, even the most die-hard fans will likely think of movies like “Rudolph the Red-Nosed Reindeer” or “Frosty the Snowman” first. Their argument is only to advance a certain purpose. I can imagine the motivation revolved around saying “Die Hard” is a Christmas movie to make it seem more interesting – so they could feed off the attention the argument would bring.

If these arguments are not enough to sway your opinion, it should be noted that “Die Hard” star Bruce Willis himself said that the film is not a Christmas movie. With that, I rested my case. Don’t sit idly by when people try to brag about the movie’s still-movie status. Real change can only happen when people stand up and make calls that demand attention.

Email: [email protected]

Twitter: @DannyMOGrady04

Danny O’Grady is a sophomore at Weinberg. He can get on. [email protected]. If you would like to publicly respond to this op-ed, send a letter to the editor. [email protected]. The views expressed in this article do not necessarily reflect the opinions of all employees of The Daily Northwestern.

Source link

Leave A Reply

Your email address will not be published.

This website uses cookies to improve your experience. We'll assume you're ok with this, but you can opt-out if you wish. Accept Read More